江西移动号码:Public comment topics and process

江西快3开奖结果查询结果 www.20xpl.cn

The Commission will invite public comment in stages throughout the term of the hearings.

  • Through August 20, 2018, the Commission will accept public comment on the topics identified in this announcement. Each topic description includes issues of particular interest to the Commission, but comments need not be restricted to these subjects.
  • Additionally, the Commission will invite comments on the topic of each hearing session. The FTC will issue a news release before each session to inform the public of the agenda, the date and location, and instructions on submitting comment.
  • The Commission will also invite public comment upon completion of the entire series of hearings.

The Commission is especially interested in new empirical research that indicates (or contraindicates) a causal relationship with respect to any of the topics identified for comment. Upon review and consideration of a public comment highlighting such research, the Commission may request the voluntary sharing of the data and models underlying the comment, in accordance with general principles of peer review of social scientific inquiry, and consistent with confidentiality or other limitations on the sharing of such data.

Commenters are invited to address one or more of the following topics generally, or with respect to a specific industry, such as the health care, high-tech, or energy industries. If an interested party wishes to make general comments about the hearings, we encourage filing a comment in response to Topic 1.

The topics

  1. The state of antitrust and consumer protection law and enforcement, and their development, since the Pitofsky hearings;
  2. Competition and consumer protection issues in communication, information, and media technology networks;
  3. The identification and measurement of market power and entry barriers, and the evaluation of collusive, exclusionary, or predatory conduct or conduct that violates the consumer protection statutes enforced by the FTC, in markets featuring “platform” businesses;
  4. The intersection between privacy, big data, and competition;
  5. The Commission’s remedial authority to deter unfair and deceptive conduct in privacy and data security matters;
  6. Evaluating the competitive effects of corporate acquisitions and mergers;
  7. Evidence and analysis of monopsony power, including but not limited to, in labor markets;
  8. The role of intellectual property and competition policy in promoting innovation;
  9. The consumer welfare implications associated with the use of algorithmic decision tools, artificial intelligence, and predictive analytics;
  10. The interpretation and harmonization of state and federal statutes and regulations that prohibit unfair and deceptive acts and practices; and
  11. The agency’s investigation, enforcement and remedial processes.

?

1. The state of antitrust and consumer protection law and enforcement, and their development, since the Pitofsky hearings

Of particular interest to the Commission is comment on:

  1. the continued viability of the consumer welfare standard for antitrust law enforcement and policy;
  2. economic analysis and evidence on market competitiveness, enforcement policy, and the effects of past FTC enforcement decisions;
  3. the identification of new developments in markets and in business-to-business or business-to-consumer relationships;
  4. the benefits and costs associated with the growth of international competition and consumer protection enforcement regimes; and
  5. the advisory and advocacy role of the FTC regarding enforcement efforts by competition and consumer protection agencies outside the United States, when such efforts have a direct effect on important U.S. interests.

?

?

2. Competition and consumer protection issues in communication, information, and media technology networks

FTC staff’s 1996 Competition Policy in the New High-Tech Global Marketplace report discussed the competitive analysis of both unilateral and joint conduct in industries subject to network effects; and FTC staff’s 2007 Broadband Connectivity and Competition Policy report addressed similar issues in the broadband internet access service market.

Of particular interest to the Commission is comment on:

  1. whether contemporary industry practices in networked industries continue to present competition and consumer protection concerns like those discussed in the prior reports;
  2. the welfare effects of regulatory intervention to promote standardization and interoperability;
  3. the application of the FTC’s Section 5 authority to the broadband internet access service business; and
  4. unique competition and consumer protection issues associated with internet and online commerce.

?

?

3. The identification and measurement of market power and entry barriers, and the evaluation of collusive, exclusionary, or predatory conduct or conduct that violates the consumer protection statutes enforced by the FTC, in markets featuring “platform” businesses

Of particular interest to the Commission is comment on:

  1. whether the platform business model has unique implications for antitrust and consumer protection law enforcement and policy; and
  2. whether and how the presence of “network effects” should affect the Commission’s analysis of competition and consumer protection issues in these markets.

?

?

4. The intersection between privacy, big data, and competition

Of particular interest to the Commission are comment and causal empirical studies on:

  1. data as a dimension of competition, and/or as an impediment to entry into or expansion within a relevant market;
  2. competition on privacy and data security attributes (between, for example, social media companies or app developers), and the importance of this competition to consumers and users;
  3. whether consumers prefer free/ad-supported products to products offering similar services or capabilities but that are neither free nor ad-supported;
  4. the benefits and costs of privacy laws and regulations, including the effect of such regulations on innovation, product offerings, and other dimensions of competition and consumer protection;
  5. the benefits and costs of varying state, federal and international privacy laws and regulations, including the conflicts associated with those standards; and
  6. competition and consumer protection implications of use and location tracking mechanisms.

?

?

5. The Commission’s remedial authority to deter unfair and deceptive conduct in privacy and data security matters

Of particular interest to the Commission is comment on:

  1. the efficacy of the Commission’s use of its current remedial authority; and
  2. the identification of any additional tools or authorities the Commission may need to adequately deter unfair and deceptive conduct related to privacy and data security.

?

?

6. Evaluating the competitive effects of corporate acquisitions and mergers

Of particular interest to the Commission is comment on:

  1. the economic and legal analysis of vertical and conglomerate mergers;
  2. whether the doctrine of potential competition is sufficient to identify and analyze the competitive effects (if any) associated with the acquisition of a firm that may be a nascent competitive threat;
  3. the analysis of acquisitions and holding of a non-controlling ownership interest in competing companies;
  4. the identification and evaluation of the exercise of monopsony power and buyer-power as arising from consolidation;
  5. the identification and evaluation of differentiated but potentially competing technologies, and of disruptive or generational changes in technology, and how such technologies affect competitive effects analysis; and
  6. empirical validation of the analytical tools used to evaluate acquisitions and mergers (e.g., models of upward pricing pressure, gross upward pricing pressure, net innovation pressure, critical loss analysis, compensating marginal cost reduction, merger simulation, natural experiments, and empirical estimation of demand systems).

?

?

7. Evidence and analysis of monopsony power, including but not limited to, in labor markets

Of particular interest to the Commission are comment and causal empirical studies on:

  1. the analytic framework applied to conduct and transactions that negatively or positively affect competition between employers as buyers in labor markets;
  2. evidence regarding the existence and exercise of buyer monopsony or market power in properly defined markets, including by employers in labor markets;
  3. the exercise of monopsony power through collusion, including in labor markets through employer collusion; and
  4. the use of non-competition agreements and the conditions under which their use may be inconsistent with the antitrust laws.

?

?

8. The role of intellectual property and competition policy in promoting innovation

The Commission has taken a dual-pronged approach to issues arising at the intersection of intellectual property and antitrust law:

  1. antitrust enforcement against harmful business conduct involving intellectual property; and
  2. competition advocacy regarding the development of intellectual property law.

The Commission has articulated its enforcement positions in a number of public documents, including the joint Commission and Department of Justice 2017 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property and 2007 Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights report. The Commission has engaged in substantial competition advocacy with respect to the legal and policy regime related to intellectual property rights, including its three “IP” reports: the 2003 To Promote Innovation report, the 2011 Evolving IP Marketplace report, and the 2016 Patent Assertion Entity Activity report. Of particular interest to the Commission is comment from intellectual property owners, licensors, and licensees and academic, legal and policy experts, on, and economic analysis of:

  1. the adoption and utilization of novel business practices (beyond those addressed in the Commission’s prior guidance and actions) with respect to obtaining or enforcing intellectual property rights, where such practices may be inconsistent with the antitrust laws;
  2. identification of contemporary patent doctrine that substantially affects innovation and raises the greatest challenges for competition policy;
  3. evaluation of intellectual property litigation in competitive effects analysis; and
  4. evaluation of efficiencies and entry considerations in technology markets in merger analysis.

?

?

9. The consumer welfare implications associated with the use of algorithmic decision tools, artificial intelligence, and predictive analytics

Of particular interest to the Commission is comment on:

  1. the welfare effects and privacy implications associated with the application of these technologies to consumer advertising and marketing campaigns;
  2. the welfare implications associated with use of these technologies in the determination of a firm’s pricing and output decisions; and
  3. whether restrictions on the use of computer and machine learning and data analytics affect innovation or consumer rights and opportunities in existing or future markets, or in the development of new business models.

?

?

10. The interpretation and harmonization of state and federal statutes and regulations that prohibit unfair and deceptive acts and practices

Of interest to the Commission is comment on:

  1. whether and to what extent other enforcement entities authorized to prosecute unfair or deceptive acts and practices apply FTC precedent in their enforcement efforts; and
  2. whether the Commission can, and to what extent it should, take steps to promote harmonization between the FTC Act and similar statutes.

?

?

11. The agency’s investigation, enforcement and remedial processes

Of particular interest to the Commission is comment on:

  1. whether the agency’s investigative process can be improved without diminishing the ability of the Commission to identify and prosecute prohibited conduct;
  2. the extent to which the Commission’s Part 3 process facilitates timely and efficient administrative litigation;
  3. the efficacy of the Commission’s current use of its remedial authority; and
  4. willingness of affected parties to cooperate with the Commission in conducting post-investigation and enforcement retrospectives.

?

?

How to Submit Public Comments

Interested parties are invited to submit written comments on the topics listed above to the FTC, either electronically or in paper form. FTC staff may use these comments in any subsequent reports or policy papers. Comments should refer to “Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century Hearings, Project Number P181201.” If an interested party wishes to comment on multiple topics, we encourage filing a separate comment for each topic. If an interested party wishes to make general comments about the hearings, we encourage filing a comment in response to Topic 1, using this link. For this stage of the public comment process, comments will be accepted until August 20, 2018.

If you prefer to file a comment in hard copy, write ‘‘Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century Hearing, Project Number P181201,” on your comment and on the envelope and mail your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC–5610 (Annex C), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex C), Washington, DC 20024.

Please note that your comment – including your name and state – may become part of the public record of this project. Comments may be included on a publicly accessible FTC website in connection with these public hearings. Because comments may be made public, they should not include any sensitive or confidential information. In particular, your comment should not contain any sensitive personal information, such as a Social Security Number, date of birth, driver’s license number or other state identification number, or credit or debit card number; comments that contain such information will not become part of the public record, and will be deleted or destroyed. Comments also should not include any sensitive health information, such as medical records or other individually identifiable health information; comments that include such information will not become part of the public record and will be deleted or destroyed. Without prior discussion with and approval of staff of the Commission, comments should not include “trade secrets or any commercial or financial information which is . . . privileged or confidential” – as provided in Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 46(f) and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2) – including, in particular, competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.

Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled “Confidential,” and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c). For any copyrighted material, please provide authorization (signed by the publisher or author if they retain the copyright) so that the material may be republished on the agency’s website.

If any entity has provided funding for research, analysis, or commentary that is included in a submitted public comment, such funding and its source should be identified on the first page of any submitted comment.

The FTC Act and other laws that the Commission administers permit the collection of public comments. More information may be found in the FTC’s privacy policy.